[Answer] Which one of the following activities is not an example of incident coordination?

Answer of Which one of the following activities is not an example of incident coordination

Question: Which one of the following activities is not an example of incident coordination?

A. Establishing priorities among incidents.

B. Directing, ordering, or controlling.

C. Synchronized Public information messages.

D. Resolving critical resources issues.

Answer: Directing, ordering, or controlling.


Directing, ordering, or controlling is not an example of incident coordination.

The following activities are examples of incident coordination:

  • Planning and organizing
  • communicating
  • problem-solving
  • decision making
  • resource management.

By definition, incident coordination requires the effective cooperation of individuals and teams in order to achieve a common goal.

Therefore, directing, ordering, or controlling would not be an effective means of achieving this goal. Instead, it would likely lead to confusion and frustration among team members. Therefore, it is not an example of incident coordination.

When disaster strikes, it is critical that emergency responders are able to coordinate their efforts effectively. This requires planning and organization before the incident occurs, as well as good communication during the incident.

Problem-solving, decision-making, and resource management are also essential skills during an incident. If responders are unable to work together effectively, the results can be disastrous.

It is important for everyone involved in incident coordination to understand their role and what is expected of them. This includes not only emergency responders but also support staff and volunteers. By working together as a team, responders can ensure the best possible outcome for the incident.

Also Read:

  1. Which statement concerning rare threatened or endangered species is true?
  2. [Answer] Which statement best describes ecological succession?

What is incident coordination?

Incident Coordination is a process whereby multiple responders to an emergency take charge of different parts of the response, such as prevention, control, and recovery.

The Incident Command System (ICS) is the widely-used platform by which responders can coordinate their activities.

ICD-G540 ICS for All Hazards describes the Incident Command System and explains how to use it in different types of emergencies. It is published by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and is available in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese.

How does incident coordination work?

Incident Coordination works by establishing a common operating picture for all responders. This allows them to share information, resources, and tasks as needed.

ICS provides a structure for managing the response and ensures that everyone is working towards the same goal.

What are the stages of incident coordination?

There are five ICS activities: Command, Planning, Operations, Logistics, and Finance/Administration. Each activity is responsible for one part of the response. The order in which they occur can change depending on how quickly responders arrive at an emergency scene.

Command is responsible for setting the overall strategy for the response and directing the other activities.

Planning creates the plan of action and determines what resources are needed.

Operations carry out the plan, using the resources that have been allocated.

Logistics ensures that those resources are delivered to where they are needed.

Finance/Administration manages the financial and administrative aspects of the response.

What are the benefits of incident coordination?

The benefits of Incident Coordination include:

– improved communication between responders

– better use of resources

– increased efficiency and effectiveness of the response

– reduced duplication of efforts

– improved situational awareness

One of the most important benefits is improved communication between responders. This can be done in a variety of ways, such as through a common operating picture or by using radios that can communicate across different frequencies.

When responders are able to communicate effectively, they can make better use of their resources and be more efficient and effective in their response.

Another important benefit is increased situational awareness. By having a better understanding of what is happening on the ground, responders can make better decisions about how to allocate their resources and respond to the incident.

Finally, reducing duplication of efforts can help improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the response. By using a coordinated approach, responders can avoid doing tasks that have already been done or that can be done by someone else. This can help reduce the overall response time and save valuable resources.

While there are many benefits to incident coordination, it is important to note that it is not always possible to have a perfectly coordinated response.

There will always be some amount of variability in the response due to the nature of emergencies. However, by using some level of coordination, responders can improve the chances of a successful outcome.

Introduction to the Incident Command System (ICS)

Incident Cordination FAQ

Final Words

In conclusion, incident coordination can have a number of benefits for responders, including improved communication, increased situational awareness, and reduced duplication of efforts.

These benefits can help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the response and help to ensure a successful outcome.

I hope this article has helped you with information on Which one of the following activities is not an example of incident coordination?. Thanks for Reading!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.